Roadscape corridor packet - screening draft

Fremont Blvd @ Mowry Ave

Fremont, CA. Real Caltrans data separated from screening estimates and field gaps - same format as the Fremont report, auto-assembled from the free-pool pipeline (corridor data + research + swept-path). Not PE-stamped.

Nearby AADT context220,000freeway context - not the arterial
Peak hour15,300Caltrans, where available
Swept-path (worst)FAIL5 turns run AASHTO off-track
Evidence statusScreeningnot PE-stamped
Roadscape does not add crash-reduction factors together. Ranges are evidence references, not promises. Combined outcomes require verified volumes, local crash history, final geometry, and licensed engineering review.

0. Proof Status

Real Caltrans/public facts kept separate from Roadscape estimates and from what still has to be measured in the field.

Real / measured

3 items
  • nearby state-route AADT context (measured): I-880 @PM 2.283 - FREMONT, JCT. RTE. 262 EAST, AADT 220,000, peak 15,300. [FREEWAY/interchange context - NOT this arterial's own volume]
  • 8 nearby Caltrans state-route segments matched (source: Caltrans public AADT ArcGIS).
  • Swept-path scene loaded: Fremont corridor - Fremont Blvd -> Mowry Ave -> I-880 N (Exit 17) - 5 modeled turns (Roadscape geometry).

Estimated

3 assumptions
  • Classification: surface arterial (verify against city functional-class map).
  • Peak-hour v/c, delay, and exposure: screening estimates until field-measured.
  • This corridor own-volume is still a screening gap unless the Caltrans segment directly matches the corridor. Use city counts or Roadscape video counts before citing flow/v-c.

Needs field measurement

4 gaps
  • Turning-movement + ped/bike counts (Roadscape video analyzer - no field count in hand yet).
  • Verified SWITRS/TIMS crash history for this corridor (export from tims.berkeley.edu tims-crashes.csv).
  • Curb-to-curb width + controlling design-vehicle swept-path (run the Roadscape swept-path per turn).
  • Fire/EMS route status + emergency access confirmation.

1. Corridor Overview

The corridor

JurisdictionFremont, CA
Classsurface arterial (verify)
AADT context only220,000 (freeway nearby)
Segments matched8

Nearby measured segments (Caltrans AADT)

I-880 @PM 2.283220,000 - FREMONT, JCT. RTE. 262 EAST
I-880 @PM 3.247198,000 - FREMONT, LANDING ROAD/ FREMONT BOU
I-880 @PM 10.3195,000 - FREMONT, NORTH JCT. RTE. 84
I-880 @PM 11.404195,000 - FREMONT, FREMONT BOULEVARD
I-880 @PM 4.712186,000 - FREMONT, DURHAM ROAD/ GRIMMER BOUL
I-880 @PM 6.239186,000 - FREMONT, STEVENSON BOULEVARD

2. Flow Diagnosis

Volume context

Top AADT220,000
Peak hour15,300
SourceCaltrans (measured)
Corridor own-volumeneeds local/city or video count

This AADT is context only. The corridor own peak-hour volume must be measured or sourced from the city before flow/v-c is cited.

Movement counts

SourceREPRESENTATIVE - pending Roadscape video count
AM/PM throughfield count needed
Turnsfield count needed
Ped/bikefield count needed

3. Geometry / Swept-Path

Each turn run through the Roadscape swept-path engine (AASHTO low-speed off-tracking) for real design vehicles. Controlling result: FAIL at Mowry Ave -> interchange approach (RIGHT). Screening-grade - verify field geometry.

Turn 1: Fremont Blvd -> Mowry Ave (LEFT study int.)

Angle90
Curb radius40 ft
Turn radius46 ft
Available width~17 ft
Design vehicleOff-track (ft)Swept width (ft)Fit
P - Passenger car1.38.3PASS
SU-30 - Single-unit truck4.612.6PASS
BUS-40 - City transit bus (40ft)7.415.9ENCROACHES
WB-40 - Semi (WB-40)11.720.2ENCROACHES
WB-67 - Interstate semi (WB-67)42.350.8ENCROACHES

Field confidencehigh Fremont Hub / Target

Turn 2: Mowry Ave -> interchange approach (RIGHT)

Angle90
Curb radius30 ft
Turn radius35.5 ft
Available width~14.8 ft
Design vehicleOff-track (ft)Swept width (ft)Fit
P - Passenger car1.78.7PASS
SU-30 - Single-unit truck6.214.2ENCROACHES
BUS-40 - City transit bus (40ft)10.318.8ENCROACHES
WB-40 - Semi (WB-40)17.626.1ENCROACHES
WB-67 - Interstate semi (WB-67)--FAIL

Field confidencemed past Goodwill(4025)/Metro PCS(4095), toward I-880

Turn 3: Interchange weave (RIGHT)

Angle90
Curb radius25 ft
Turn radius30.5 ft
Available width~14.1 ft
Design vehicleOff-track (ft)Swept width (ft)Fit
P - Passenger car2.19.1PASS
SU-30 - Single-unit truck7.515.5ENCROACHES
BUS-40 - City transit bus (40ft)1321.5ENCROACHES
WB-40 - Semi (WB-40)--FAIL
WB-67 - Interstate semi (WB-67)--FAIL

Field confidencelow I-880/Cedar interchange frontage

Turn 4: Interchange weave (LEFT)

Angle90
Curb radius25 ft
Turn radius30.5 ft
Available width~14.1 ft
Design vehicleOff-track (ft)Swept width (ft)Fit
P - Passenger car2.19.1PASS
SU-30 - Single-unit truck7.515.5ENCROACHES
BUS-40 - City transit bus (40ft)1321.5ENCROACHES
WB-40 - Semi (WB-40)--FAIL
WB-67 - Interstate semi (WB-67)--FAIL

Field confidencelow on-ramp approach

Turn 5: I-880 North on-ramp merge (Exit 17)

Angle40
Curb radius150 ft
Turn radius157.5 ft
Available width~21 ft
Design vehicleOff-track (ft)Swept width (ft)Fit
P - Passenger car0.47.4PASS
SU-30 - Single-unit truck1.39.3PASS
BUS-40 - City transit bus (40ft)210.5PASS
WB-40 - Semi (WB-40)311.5PASS
WB-67 - Interstate semi (WB-67)6.815.3PASS

Field confidencemed Nimitz Fwy -> Oakland

Off-tracking uses the AASHTO low-speed radius formula. Radius = curb + half-lane; available width is a conservative screen. Field-verify curb radius + lane width before any official use. Not a substitute for AutoTURN + a licensed engineer.

4. Prescription Map

Screening candidates - not stacked. Backed by the free-pool research briefs; final call needs a PE.

Primary candidates

Dedicated right-turn pocketprimary

Lets right-turners queue out of the through lane where blocked-turn queues occur; keep the crossing short + protected.

Evidencerear-end/angle ~20-55% (reference)
Needsturning counts; queue events; curb-to-curb width
Signal retiming / protected turnprimary

Cheapest flow smoother; protected phase cuts turn crashes where they cluster.

Evidencedelay 10-30% (reference)
Needssignal plans; turn volumes; delay observation

Study instead

Road diet (43)study

Best-documented safety fix if daily traffic stays under ~20-25k; reclaims width. Verify this corridor's OWN volume first.

Evidence~19-47% crash reduction (reference)
Backfires whenADT above ~25k, or a true regional through-route

Complements

Leading Ped Intervalcomplement

Cheap signal change, strong ped safety record.

Evidence~13-59% ped crash reduction (reference)
Truck/bus turning-radius fitcomplement

Corners must fit the design vehicle so it doesn't off-track - balance vs. car turn speed past crosswalks.

Needsheavy-vehicle counts; swept-path template

5. Packet Grade and Value Path

Professional grade

CurrentB+ screening-grade
With local dataA- with local crash, arterial volume, video counts, and delay/exposure data
With reviewA+ with field verification and qualified professional sign-off

$75k-$120k per multi-intersection packet after crash data, local counts, measured video analysis, delay/exposure, field verification, and PE review

Value gaps

  • Add 5-year TIMS/SWITRS crash data
  • Add local arterial AADT, peak-hour counts, and turning-movement counts
  • Add measured Roadscape video analysis with curb strikes, encroachments, queues, and screenshots
  • Add delay and exposure calculations
  • Add field-verified geometry for lane widths, curb radii, and turning paths
  • Add qualified professional review/sign-off for official recommendations

6. What Must Be Measured Next

Field package

Agency ADT + classified turning counts
Multi-day AM/PM peaks
Verified SWITRS/TIMS crashes
Curb-to-curb widths
Queue length + delay
Bike/ped counts
Fire/EMS route status
Design-vehicle swept-path

Engineer review lane

This packet shows what the evidence supports, what it doesn't yet, and what to measure before a licensed engineer makes the call.

Research framing used (free-pool, self-evolving): 5 briefs.

Appendix

Nearby Caltrans AADT (all matches)

  • I-880 @PM 2.283 - FREMONT, JCT. RTE. 262 EAST: AADT 220,000, peak 15,300
  • I-880 @PM 3.247 - FREMONT, LANDING ROAD/ FREMONT BOULEVARD: AADT 198,000, peak 13,900
  • I-880 @PM 10.3 - FREMONT, NORTH JCT. RTE. 84: AADT 195,000, peak 12,900
  • I-880 @PM 11.404 - FREMONT, FREMONT BOULEVARD: AADT 195,000, peak 12,900
  • I-880 @PM 4.712 - FREMONT, DURHAM ROAD/ GRIMMER BOULEVARD: AADT 186,000, peak 12,600
  • I-880 @PM 6.239 - FREMONT, STEVENSON BOULEVARD: AADT 186,000, peak 12,800
  • I-880 @PM 7.189 - FREMONT, MOWERY AVENUE: AADT 186,000, peak 11,900
  • I-880 @PM 8.842 - FREMONT, SOUTH JCT. RTE. 84: AADT 185,000, peak 12,200

Research briefs

  • crash modification factors cmf for common corridor treatment
  • high traffic corridor scoping methodology ranking segments b
  • right turn pocket vs shared lane the queue overflow tradeoff
  • road diet feasibility check when converting a 4 lane undivid
  • turning geometry swept path how off tracking dictates curb r